Graded against the real average
X benchmarks are the lowest published anywhere. The verdict tells you whether 0.15% is a problem or above average before you change anything.
Free tool
An X engagement rate is the share of your followers who interact with a post, calculated as interactions divided by followers times 100. Enter one post below and get the rate, a verdict against the published average, and the impression-based rate that X reports to you.
Enter followers, likes and replies. Reposts and impressions are optional and unlock the impression rate. Everything runs in your browser, nothing is sent to a server, and no account is needed.
Open the post, tap the analytics icon, and copy the figures across.
Leave this empty to match the published benchmarks, which count likes and replies only.
Median 0.10%
Engagement rate by followers
—
Total interactions
—
Scale: 0% to 0.40%
Interactions per 1,000 followers
—
Shares the numbers you entered, not your data. Everything is in the link itself.
Free to embed and free to cite, no attribution deal needed. Writers, agencies and course authors are welcome to drop the calculator straight into a post, and a credit link back is all we ask.
Embed this calculator on your site
Cite this tool, HTML
Cite this tool, plain text
X sets the floor for published social benchmarks. Socialinsider put the average X engagement rate at 0.10% in its 2026 benchmarks, across a study of 70 million posts collected between January 2024 and December 2025. That is the lowest of the four platforms it tracks, against 2.60% on TikTok, 0.48% on Instagram and 0.15% on Facebook, and it is the figure the bands in this calculator are built on.
In whole numbers that is about 8 interactions on an average post to 8,000 followers. Accounts read that as failure and start posting more, which changes nothing, because the average is the average. If you also run Instagram or TikTok, the multi-platform engagement rate calculator grades each against its own benchmark rather than one blended target that no platform matches.
A percentage on its own does not tell you what to post next. These four outputs do.
X benchmarks are the lowest published anywhere. The verdict tells you whether 0.15% is a problem or above average before you change anything.
X reports impressions on every post. That is the denominator that says whether the post earned the reach it got.
At a 0.10% average, percentages stop meaning anything. "One per thousand followers" is a number you can act on.
More interactions than impressions means the two figures came from different posts. The tool says so instead of grading the mistake.
Engagement rate = (interactions / followers) * 100. On X there is a second reading available that most platforms withhold for organic posts: impressions are shown publicly under every post, so anyone can compute engagement against the audience a post actually reached rather than the audience it theoretically had. That matters more here than anywhere, because the follower count on an X account is often years old and largely dormant, while impressions describe today. Use the follower rate to compare yourself to a published benchmark, because that is what the benchmark is built on. Use the impression rate to decide whether a post worked. The two will disagree, and the disagreement is the useful part: a post with high impressions and a low follower rate found an audience outside your following, and a post with the reverse found only the people who already follow you.
Followers today against likes from a post six months ago is a different account. Open the post analytics and read all of it off one screen.
Likes and replies only, or likes plus replies plus reposts. Both are defensible. Switching between them mid-year produces a trend line that measures your formula rather than your posts.
A like costs nothing and a reply costs a sentence. Two accounts on the same rate, one earning replies and one earning taps, are not in the same business.
The published average is what an ordinary business account earns. It is the line you should clear, not the line you should aim at, and beating it by a little is not evidence that anything is working.
X rewards posts that start an argument or answer a question, and punishes announcements. Most business accounts post announcements. Volume does not fix that, and the accounts that break out of the average do it by having something to say to a specific group of people rather than by posting five times a day instead of two.
That is the work Selzee does. It reads your comments, your reviews and your post results, finds the questions and objections your audience is actually raising, and turns them into the next set of posts your team can make this week. For the paid side, pair this with the ROAS calculator.
"Nobody replies to an announcement. The accounts that beat the average are answering a question somebody actually asked."
Founders, social managers and agencies reporting on an X account who need to know whether the number in the deck is bad or ordinary. We publish no customer names or lift figures on this page, because we will not put numbers here that we cannot yet stand behind.
A rate you can compare to the published X average, not to Instagram.
The impression-based rate, which is the one X actually reports to you.
A flag when the figures you entered did not come from the same post.
Very low by the standards of every other platform. Socialinsider put the average X engagement rate at 0.10% in its 2026 benchmarks, the lowest of the four platforms in that study. Below 0.10% you are behind the field, at or above it you are normal, and at 0.20% or better you are running at double it. On 8,000 followers, an average post earns roughly 8 interactions.
Add the likes, replies and reposts on a post, divide by your follower count, and multiply by 100. 16 likes, 3 replies and 5 reposts on 8,000 followers is 24 interactions, which is 0.30%. Keep the same interaction types in every calculation or your trend line is measuring your formula rather than your posts.
X shows you impressions on every post, which almost no other platform does for organic content, so use both. Followers is what published benchmarks are calculated on and it is the only comparable figure. Impressions is what X itself reports and it grades the post on the people who actually saw it. A post with strong impressions and a weak follower rate travelled beyond your audience, which is usually good news.
In this study, yes. Socialinsider reports 2.60% on TikTok, 0.48% on Instagram, 0.15% on Facebook and 0.10% on X across the same 70 million post sample. It also recorded the largest year over year decline on X of any platform it tracks. Grading an X account against an Instagram target will make a normal account look broken.
Yes, and on X they are worth watching separately. Likes are cheap and replies are not, so an account with a low overall rate but a high reply share is having conversations rather than collecting taps. Enter replies in the comments field here, and track the split yourself over a quarter.
No. The arithmetic runs in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, no account is needed, and there is nothing to sign up for to use it.
Measuring the number takes ten seconds. Moving it takes knowing which idea earned the replies. Selzee turns your own comments, reviews and post performance into the next set of posts worth making.
Request a DemoKeep exploring: the multi-platform engagement rate calculator, the Instagram engagement rate calculator, the TikTok engagement rate calculator, the Facebook engagement rate calculator.