Graded against the real average
Facebook benchmarks are far lower than people assume. The verdict tells you whether 0.2% is a problem or a win before you change anything.
Free tool
A Facebook engagement rate is the share of your page fans who interact with a post, calculated as interactions divided by fans times 100. Enter one post below and get the rate, a verdict against the published average, and the same number restated in interactions per thousand fans.
Enter fans, reactions and comments. Shares and accounts reached are optional and unlock the reach rate. Everything runs in your browser, nothing is sent to a server, and no account is needed.
Open Meta Business Suite, pick the post, and copy the figures across.
Leave this empty to match the published benchmarks, which count reactions and comments only.
Median 0.15%
Engagement rate by followers
—
Total interactions
—
Scale: 0% to 0.60%
Interactions per 1,000 followers
—
Shares the numbers you entered, not your data. Everything is in the link itself.
Free to embed and free to cite, no attribution deal needed. Writers, agencies and course authors are welcome to drop the calculator straight into a post, and a credit link back is all we ask.
Embed this calculator on your site
Cite this tool, HTML
Cite this tool, plain text
The honest answer is much lower than the number most pages are chasing. Socialinsider put the average Facebook engagement rate at 0.15% in its 2026 benchmarks, from 25 million posts across 130,683 business pages collected between January 2024 and December 2025. That is the figure the bands here are built on. It also reports the number as flat year over year, which makes Facebook the steadiest platform in the study while Instagram fell 24%.
Put that in whole numbers, because the percentage hides it: on a 45,000 fan page, an average post earns about 68 interactions. Not 680. Pages rewrite their entire content strategy every quarter chasing a rate that organic distribution on Facebook has not supported for years. If you also run Instagram or TikTok, the multi-platform engagement rate calculator grades each against its own average instead of one blended target.
A percentage on its own does not tell you what to post next. These four outputs do.
Facebook benchmarks are far lower than people assume. The verdict tells you whether 0.2% is a problem or a win before you change anything.
Organic reach on a page is a fraction of the fan count. The reach rate grades the post on the people who actually saw it.
At a 0.15% average, percentages get hard to feel. "Two per thousand fans" is a number you can hold in your head.
More interactions than accounts reached means the two figures came from different posts. The tool says so instead of grading the mistake.
Engagement rate = (interactions / fans) * 100. The arithmetic is trivial and the argument is entirely about what goes underneath the line. Published benchmarks divide by fans, because that is the only figure an outside analyst can see, which is why this calculator grades against fans by default. Every social manager who has looked at their own reach knows the number is wrong in the useful sense: a page with 45,000 fans might put a post in front of 4,000 of them, so dividing by 45,000 measures the reach collapse rather than the post. Both readings are defensible and they answer different questions. Divide by fans when you want to know how you compare to other pages. Divide by reach when you want to know whether the post was any good. What you cannot do is switch between them across a year and call the resulting line a trend.
Fans today against reactions from a post six months ago is a different page. Open Meta Business Suite, pick the post, and read all of it off one screen.
Reactions and comments only, or reactions plus comments plus shares. Both are defensible. Switching between them mid-year produces a trend line that measures your formula rather than your posts.
A 0.15% average means an ordinary post on a 45,000 fan page earns about 68 interactions. Pages rebuild their whole strategy every quarter chasing a figure that was never achievable organically.
A link post and a native video are two different products with two different audiences. Averaging them gives you a number that describes neither and hides the format that is working.
Most page fan counts were built years ago, often by campaigns that optimised for the like rather than the customer. The rate looks broken because the denominator is full of people who were never going to buy anything, and no amount of posting fixes a mismatched audience.
That is the work Selzee does. It reads your comments, your reviews and your post results, finds the questions and objections that decide whether someone engages at all, and turns them into the next set of posts your team can make this week. For the paid side, pair this with the ROAS calculator and the conversion rate calculator.
"A page with 45,000 fans and 68 interactions does not have a posting problem. It has 45,000 fans it never had."
Founders, social managers and agencies reporting on a Facebook page who need to know whether the number in the deck is bad or ordinary. We publish no customer names or lift figures on this page, because we will not put numbers here that we cannot yet stand behind.
A rate you can compare to the published Facebook average, not to Instagram.
The reach-based rate, which grades the post on the people who saw it.
A flag when the figures you entered did not come from the same post.
Lower than almost everybody expects. Socialinsider put the average Facebook engagement rate at 0.15% in its 2026 benchmarks, from 25 million posts across 130,683 business pages. Below 0.15% you are behind the field, at or above it you are normal, and at 0.30% or better you are running at double it. A page reading 0.2% and worrying is in fact above average.
Add the reactions, comments and shares on a post, divide by your page fans, and multiply by 100. 62 reactions, 11 comments and 9 shares on 45,000 fans is 82 interactions, which is 0.18%. Keep the same interaction types in every calculation or your trend line is measuring your formula rather than your posts.
Because the benchmark is lower, not because your page is failing. The same Socialinsider study reports 0.48% on Instagram, 2.60% on TikTok and 0.10% on X. Facebook sits near the bottom of that table for every page in the sample. Judge the number against Facebook, never against another platform.
By fans to compare yourself to published benchmarks, because that is what they are calculated on. By reach to judge one post, because organic reach on a Facebook page is a fraction of the fan count and a post that reached 4,000 of your 45,000 fans should be graded on the 4,000. The two answers will look very different, and both are correct.
No. Socialinsider reports the 0.15% average as flat year over year, which makes Facebook the steadiest of the four platforms in that study. Instagram fell 24% and TikTok fell 10% over the same period. A flat rate on Facebook is a flat rate, not a decline you failed to notice.
No. The arithmetic runs in your browser. Nothing is uploaded, no account is needed, and there is nothing to sign up for to use it.
Measuring the number takes ten seconds. Moving it takes knowing which idea earned the comments. Selzee turns your own comments, reviews and post performance into the next set of posts worth making.
Request a DemoKeep exploring: the multi-platform engagement rate calculator, the Instagram engagement rate calculator, the TikTok engagement rate calculator, the conversion rate calculator.